Skip to content
CLADsolve

Diagnostic

Transbronchial biopsy: histology and transcript-based classifiers

Evidence level: abstract-only studies (cohorts and transcriptomic studies)

Biopsy histology and gene-expression classifiers are studied for CLAD, with reported associations rather than established diagnostic roles.

As of . Primary source: Parkes et al. 2022 (DOI).

Summary

According to the abstract of Parkes and colleagues (2022), whole-genome mRNA profiling of 498 prospectively collected transbronchial biopsies from the INTERLUNG study, of which 90 were diagnosed as CLAD, showed that CLAD manifested as a parenchymal response to wounding and dedifferentiation, and gene-based classifiers predicted CLAD with an area under the curve of 0.70 without time correction and 0.87 with time correction. The abstract states that histology of these biopsies yields little insight. A Toronto study (Darley 2021) reports that eosinophils on biopsy were associated with higher hazards of CLAD (1.35) and death. A KU Leuven case-control study reports histopathologic lung injury patterns on biopsy as early indicators of later RAS, and a Toronto cohort reports no significant difference in CLAD risk after a first untreated minimal (A1) rejection episode. A 2026 KU Leuven atlas reports that its findings were validated in transbronchial biopsies and describes a 26-gene hub panel. The GEO series for the Parkes study is recorded as a dataset. The abstracts do not describe a validated clinical test, and this record gives no advice.

Sources and links

Related

Links from this record

Linked from (derived)

Known gaps in this record

  • accuracy figures for histology (not in the abstracts)
  • independent validation of the classifiers (not in the abstract)
  • full text of all sources

Information resource only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for the care of the patient's transplant team.