Skip to content
CLADsolve

Bottleneck

No therapy of proven benefit for established CLAD

Evidence level: proposed bottleneck; synthesis of abstract-level sources; pending approval

No treatment has shown clear benefit for established CLAD in randomised trials, and guideline authors call for high-quality trials.

As of . Primary source: ESOT clinical practice guideline (DOI).

Summary

Several sources opened for this record agree on an evidence gap. The 2026 ESOT guideline (GRADE methodology) found current data inconclusive for anti-thymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab and extracorporeal photopheresis against standard care, did not support antifibrotics in BOS, and emphasised the urgent need for high-quality trials. A 90-patient European phase II trial of pirfenidone in progressive BOS found no difference in FEV1 change from placebo. A 2023 review of lymphocyte-depleting therapies states that interpretation of most results is hampered by the lack of randomised controlled trials. A 2026 early economic model states there was very little quality evidence to inform it. A survey of 44 European centres found no single treatment strategy universally used. The word proven is used here only to mean shown in randomised trials as reported in these abstracts.

Details

barrier type
therapeutic evidence

Sources and links

Related

Links from this record

Known gaps in this record

  • results of the registered phase 3 and phase 2 trials linked here (not read)
  • strength and certainty rating of each ESOT recommendation (full text not read)
  • any therapy specific to RAS (the sources opened do not report one)

Information resource only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for the care of the patient's transplant team.