Skip to content
CLADsolve

Paper

Global approaches to chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Toward evidence-based harmonization

Evidence level: review; abstract-only

A 2026 review describes converging CLAD diagnostic practice but persistent international variation in therapy, and names comparative evidence gaps as research priorities.

As of . Primary source: Publisher record via DOI.

Summary

This single-author review states that international surveys show practice harmonisation alongside persistent geographic variation. Diagnostic work-up has converged (spirometry, chest CT, bronchoscopy with lavage and biopsy, donor-specific antibody testing) but more standardisation is needed for pulmonary function reporting, imaging protocols and pathology workflows. Therapy is more heterogeneous, with major differences in azithromycin prophylaxis, reflux management, corticosteroid pulses, lymphocyte-depleting agents, extracorporeal photopheresis, montelukast and bronchodilators. The author argues that such variation identifies priorities where comparative evidence is lacking, and calls for standardised treatment algorithms, biomarker-guided interventions and pragmatic trials.

Details

doi
10.1016/j.healun.2026.07.029
pmid
42521131
authors
Vos R
journal
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
year
2026

Sources and links

Related

Links from this record

Linked from (derived)

Known gaps in this record

  • full text not read (abstract only)
  • funding statement and grant numbers
  • full text and cited surveys (not read)
  • funding and conflicts of interest

Information resource only. Not medical advice. Not a substitute for the care of the patient's transplant team.